We have been unifying this party. Five of those 17 candidates have endorsed our campaign. And different parts of the party. We’ve been unifying fiscal conservatives. Evangelicals. Young people. Do you know that Ted has been winning the millennial vote in state after state? He’s been winning the women’s vote in state after state. Ted is an immigrant. He is Hispanic. He can unify this party. We have libertarians joining our cause. I have people everyday from the Democrat party telling that they have re-registered to vote for Ted as a Republican because they understand what he stands for and he represents American values.
Over the years I’ve said some pretty awful things about TSA and TSA employees. But last night on my way home from the CAGOP convention the TSA employee (non-white, BTW) who greeted me saw my Trump buttons and raised his fist at me, saying: “Hey, FIST BUMP FOR TRUMP!” Nice guy, totally cool.
Breaking-Exclusive: Co-Author Neal Katyal of Harvard Law Review Forum Article on Ted Cruz eligibility argued in favor (and the U.S. Supreme Court Ruling agreed) of and for upholding the applicable …
Source: Breaking-Exclusive: Co-Author Neal Katyal of Harvard Law Review Forum (HLRF) Article on Cruz Eligibility Argued 1952 INA Law Make Persons “naturalized Citizens” but in the 2016 NHRF Article – Not So for Ted Cruz – Katyal Double Talking to America – CDR Kerchner (Ret)’s Blog
IRREFUTABLE AUTHORITY HAS SPOKEN by John Charlton (Oct. 18, 2009) — The Post & Email has in several articles mentioned that the Supreme Court of the
Just a week ago, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court tossed out a court challenge to Sen. Ted Cruz’s eligibility to run for president of the United States – based on his birth in Canada to an American mother – and several other similar cases have fallen by the wayside also because of technical issues. But on […]
Any Cruz-supporting delegate should be damned locally for subverting the will of the people.
As WaPo reports, delegates are “shopped” in a wild, westerny field of wildcatters:
Federal rules do not provide clear guidance about whether delegates can accept items of value from a campaign, other than reimbursement for their travel expenses. Campaign finance lawyers are divided over whether federal or state anti-bribery statutes would apply to delegates who are not elected officials — and if so, what kinds of perks or inducements could be illegal.
HuffPo is obviously not the best source of policy wisdom, but it’s a great source for intelligence about what the left is up to, and they are up to exactly what I have predicted since my fellow tea party activists leapt over the cliff like lemmings, subject to Cruz control:
Scholars Agree that Ted Cruz is Not Constitutionally Eligible
But what if a candidate misrepresents his basic eligibility for ballot access. Is there legal remedy for that fraud? Again, Ted Cruz provides best evidence.Democrat and Republican partisans alike have agreed that the Canadian-born Cruz is not a “natural born” American citizen as textually required by Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution. Indeed, Mr. Cruz held onto his resulting Canadian citizenship from the time of his birth until May 2014.Not eligible for the presidency, the vice-presidency is also verboten. If Ted Cruz is chosen for the GOP ticket — “playing top or bottom” — the debate over his constitutional ineligibility will go nuclear. House Democrat Alan Grayson pledges to initiate lawsuits: “I’m waiting for the moment that he gets the nomination.”And many nonpartisan legal scholars agree. Ted Cruz’s Harvard Law teacher Laurence Tribe first raised the concern. On Slate, University of Chicago Law Professor Eric Posner put the case directly:Because Cruz was not “natural born”—not born in the United States—he is ineligible for the presidency…. To naturalize … is to confer citizenship status but not to somehow convert him to having been born in America; similarly, to confer citizenship by statute to someone born abroad to an American parent is not the same thing as retroactively making that person born in this country—making him natural born—which would be impossible.Other top academics concur. Legal historian Mary Brigid McManamon’s presents the most comprehensive analysis. Harvard Law Professor Einer R. Elhauge’s recent work, taking the form of a 2016 amicus brief, proves beyond doubt that Mr. Cruz is not eligible — for the presidency or vice-presidency.